![]() ![]() Then the intent of the druid's wishes are used by the DM to choose an animal.so a hawk maybe in the first example, or some wolves, apes, or bear for the second. Or a druid who is going into a desperate battle asking for a "ferocious beast to fight by his side". ![]() I can see a druid that is laying there, left for dead with two broken legs, "asking the spirits of the Fey to send a swift beast that can deliver a message to someone" (e.g., the player says "I want something fast, preferably a bird"). Now, that said, I believe the spirit of the rules should allow for the druid to choose a general 'purpose' of creature.as that makes sense in a narrative way to me. By excluding saying that you can choose what exactly and where, to me, that is telling. ![]() When I read it, it says what you can do.you can choose the CR and you can choose what it does by issuing a verbal command. The DM will often choose creatures that are appropriate for the campaign and that will be fun to introduce in a scene. For example, if you pick the second option, the DM chooses the two elementals that have a challenge rating of 1 or lower.Ī spellcaster can certainly express a preference for what creatures shows up, but it’s up to the DM to determine if they do. The design intent for options like these is that the spellcaster chooses one of them, and then the DM decides what creatures appear that fit the chosen option.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |